色影无忌上说LX3不好的可以住嘴了。这是DPReview刚放出来的G10评测。这一页和这一页详细的测试了两款相机摄影的区别。
真实场景(ISO80)下表现
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6268/c62685ce469dd7926c44d949b75028d62c8c08fe" alt="Canon G10 ISO 80"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36391/36391034448054cfcdf7c3b3d33cda00df766834" alt="Panasonic LX3 ISO 80"
单色细节度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22722/22722b312edfffb3891a9d2c0b1cf8e0951f5c3c" alt="Canon G10 ISO 80"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99119/9911914c5a9978f623b6736c75f6f2e02f264797" alt="Panasonic LX3 ISO 80"
偏色
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d364/3d3643c6f7c37f3756c4aa6b720b027871144ae2" alt="Canon G10 ISO 80"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a66c/2a66cf76ef13737823926e00a3b5a68a405d6af6" alt="Panasonic LX3 ISO 80"
各ISO下表现(ISO400,消费DC最常用的高ISO)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157e7/157e7354a28b43b7f40c91ad7afb60369b8fa6ec" alt="Canon PowerShot G10"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f7c/06f7c3e2cd406c07f1c0bb717a65f06c070936ed" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc990/cc9900b5cacaa489f6ae6c8866371c45d272e1ad" alt="Nikon Coolpix P6000"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc9a/abc9ace884b9b7c61c78086a4f0b753e2d84e73e" alt="Canon PowerShot G9"
看似燥点多的LX3实际上保留了最多的细节,却又不像P6000一样杂讯突出。
HERMIT COTTAGE
色影无忌上说LX3不好的可以住嘴了。这是DPReview刚放出来的G10评测。这一页和这一页详细的测试了两款相机摄影的区别。
看似燥点多的LX3实际上保留了最多的细节,却又不像P6000一样杂讯突出。
S
RE 水妹:我还推荐过G9啊?不记得了哈哈。G9在当时的确是一代经典嘛。RE cindi:看来你买了G10,哈哈。RE yaya:哈哈,人家说小资。我到觉得外观有点太漂亮了,我倒是其实喜欢稍微糙一点的
十六年前 Unknown · Unknown